Racialized Conflict and Policy Spillover Effects: The Role of Race in the Contemporary U.S. Welfare State1
This article introduces a racialized conflict theory to explain how racial divisions structure welfare state development in the absence of de jure discrimination. The author explains the effect of racial divisions on policy outcomes as the result of the attitudinal, cultural, and political spillover...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The American journal of sociology Vol. 119; no. 2; pp. 394 - 443 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Chicago Press
01-09-2013
|
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This article introduces a racialized conflict theory to explain how racial divisions structure welfare state development in the absence of de jure discrimination. The author explains the effect of racial divisions on policy outcomes as the result of the attitudinal, cultural, and political spillover effects of prevailing conflicts in a social field. Using a paired-case comparison and analysis of multiple data sources, the author applies this theory to analyze Georgia's and Alabama's surprisingly divergent welfare reforms in the 1990s. Results support the racialized conflict theory and suggest important revisions to prevailing theories about the sociopolitical effects of contemporary racial divides. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0002-9602 1537-5390 |
| DOI: | 10.1086/674005 |