N-type Ca super(2+) channels carry the largest current: implications for nanodomains and transmitter release
Presynaptic terminals favor intermediate-conductance Ca sub(V)2.2 (N type) over high-conductance Ca sub(V)1 (L type) channels for single-channel, Ca super(2+) nanodomain-triggered synaptic vesicle fusion. However, the standard Ca sub(V)1>Ca sub(V)2� 3E; Ca sub(V)3 conductance hierarchy is...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature neuroscience Vol. 13; no. 11; pp. 1348 - 1350 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
01-11-2010
|
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Presynaptic terminals favor intermediate-conductance Ca sub(V)2.2 (N type) over high-conductance Ca sub(V)1 (L type) channels for single-channel, Ca super(2+) nanodomain-triggered synaptic vesicle fusion. However, the standard Ca sub(V)1>Ca sub(V)2� 3E; Ca sub(V)3 conductance hierarchy is based on recordings using nonphysiological divalent ion concentrations. We found that, with physiological Ca super(2+) gradients, the hierarchy was Ca sub(V)2.2>Ca sub(V)1&#x 003E; Ca sub(V)3. Mathematical modeling predicts that the Ca sub(V)2.2 Ca super(2+) nanodomain, which is 25% more extensive than that generated by Ca sub(V)1, can activate a calcium-fusion sensor located on the proximal face of the synaptic vesicle. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 1097-6256 |
DOI: | 10.1038/nn.2657 |