US and British approaches to force protection

US and British approaches to force protection

Compares national doctrines and politics, and resulting differences in public images of the two armed forces engaged in peacekeeping in the Balkans. British civilian leaders and parliament, US civilian leaders and Congress, distinguishing improper pressure from planning guidance, rumors of US casual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Military review Vol. 81; no. 4; pp. 73 - 81
Main Author: Caniglia, Richard R
Format: Magazine Article
Language:English
Published: 01-08-2001
Subjects:
Balkan states
Casualties
Civil-military relations
Great Britain
Military policy
Military strategy
Peacekeeping forces
Sociology, Military
United States
War
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Compares national doctrines and politics, and resulting differences in public images of the two armed forces engaged in peacekeeping in the Balkans. British civilian leaders and parliament, US civilian leaders and Congress, distinguishing improper pressure from planning guidance, rumors of US casualty intolerance, grass-roots mythology, and military cultures and traditions of an imperial versus a people's army.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Government & Official Document-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0026-4148