Argument and seventeenth-century science: a rhetorical analysis with sociological implications

Compares the argumentative practices of the English and French scientific communities from the origin of the scientific journal in 1665 up to 1700. To that end, asks a uniform set of questions related to argumentative practice in a large sample of articles randomly drawn from the 3 preeminent scient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social studies of science Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 371 - 396
Main Authors: Gross, A G, Harmon, J E, Reidy, M S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-06-2000
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Compares the argumentative practices of the English and French scientific communities from the origin of the scientific journal in 1665 up to 1700. To that end, asks a uniform set of questions related to argumentative practice in a large sample of articles randomly drawn from the 3 preeminent scientific journals of this period. The results suggest an interesting link between sociopolitical structures and their influence on early scientific societies, and the articles in their fledgling publications. In particular, the early professionalisation of French science through the Academie Royale led to a heightened emphasis on features familiar in twentieth-century practice: quantification, mathematical and mechanical explanations for acquired facts, visual representations of facts and their explanations, and use of observations and experimental results as stepping stones to theory. (Original abstract - amended)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0306-3127