Cold Rich Bypass to Strippers for CO sub(2) Capture by Concentrated Piperazine
Cold rich bypass to the stripper in CO sub(2) capture by alkanolamines will usually reduce the total heat duty. Bypass reduces the stripping steam in the overhead vapor and balances the temperature approach in the main cross exchanger. This process improvement reduces the energy requirement of any c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemical engineering & technology Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 149 - 156 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
01-01-2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Cold rich bypass to the stripper in CO sub(2) capture by alkanolamines will usually reduce the total heat duty. Bypass reduces the stripping steam in the overhead vapor and balances the temperature approach in the main cross exchanger. This process improvement reduces the energy requirement of any configuration, but it is most beneficial when the overhead vapor is not already countercurrently contacted with incoming rich solution. Therefore, the 2-stage flash configuration was evaluated in this work, and it had an improvement of 11% over the no bypass case. Its improvement was better than what was observed with a simple stripper and interheated column. An optimized cool rich bypass for a pilot scale 2-stage reduces the equivalent work. Amine scrubbing will be the most dominant technology used for CO sub(2) capture. In the 2-stage regeneration of piperazine, a cold rich bypass reduces the equivalent work requirement, the stripping steam in the overhead vapor, and balances the temperature approach in the main cross exchanger. It is most beneficial when the overhead vapor is not already countercurrently contacted with incoming rich solution. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0930-7516 1521-4125 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ceat.201200533 |