Cosmographical Readings of the Qur'an
The Qur'an is the primary source of inspiration for Muslims across the ages. As Muslims, the task is to make the Qur'an relevant to our own context. That task is however challenged every time the conception of the world changes. The change from a medieval Aristotelian to a modern heliocent...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of Islam & society (Online) Vol. 40; no. 1/2; pp. 8 - 38 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Herndon
International Institute of Islamic Thought
01-01-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The Qur'an is the primary source of inspiration for Muslims across the ages. As Muslims, the task is to make the Qur'an relevant to our own context. That task is however challenged every time the conception of the world changes. The change from a medieval Aristotelian to a modern heliocentric view of the world represented just such a challenge. But regardless of the differing worldviews, the Qur'an's descriptions of natural phenomena remained relevant. Accordingly, the aim of this article is to demonstrate the correspondence between the Qur'anic description of natural phenomena and various scientific paradigms. It claims that the Qur'an is relevant to both past and present scientific paradigms, even if these paradigms conflict with one another. This claim is illustrated through the example of cosmographies. It shows that the Qur'an's cosmographical verses can be read considering both ancient and modern paradigms. This multiplicity of correspondences is achieved: (1) by means of subjective descriptions, which are open to interpretation, (2) by means of negative affirmations, which allude to certain paradigms without fully endorsing them, and (3) through a silence about key elements that would unambiguously validate or refute a specific scientific paradigm. The Qur'an's interpretatively open cosmographical verses also include particularly apt word choices and morphology when it comes to considering them in the light of modern scientific paradigms. The philosophical and theological consequences of this multiplicity of correspondence are also discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2690-3733 2690-3741 |
DOI: | 10.35632/ajis.v40il-2.3175 |