Separating the effects of group size, density, and enclosure size on movement and use of space in domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus)

• Main Author: Leone, Erin Hoerl
• Format: Dissertation
• Language: English
• Published: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses 01-01-2008
• Subjects: Animal sciences; Livestock
• ISBN: 9780549572800; 0549572805

This project was designed to separate the confounded effects of group size, density, and enclosure size, and to examine the role of enclosure design and its related parameters in shaping movement patterns and use of space in the domestic fowl. While previous research has suggested that group size, density, and enclosure size are highly relevant to broiler (meat-type chicken) welfare, confounding between variables makes their individual contribution difficult to distinguish. My novel treatment structure with 10, 20, and 30 birds in small (1.5 m2), medium (3.0 m2), and large (4.5 m2) enclosures enabled me to determine the impact of enclosure size while systematically controlling for group size and density. Three enclosure designs: rectangular, square, and square with partitions to maintain a constant perimeter to area ratio, were employed in order to determine the impact of enclosure parameters such as length to width and perimeter to area ratio. Enclosure size and design were the most relevant factors for space use, which was immune to the influence of group size and density. Birds consistently had larger home ranges in larger enclosures. The design of the enclosure had a strong effect of movement, altering the response of birds to the treatment combinations. Movement appeared to be greatest in rectangular enclosures, where the largest straight-line distance is available and the perimeter to area ratio declines at a relatively slow rate with increasing enclosure size. While enclosure size played a significant role in determining nearest neighbor distances and net displacement, these parameters appeared to be limited by density. The presence of partitions designed to increase interior perimeter space appeared to reduce movement and increase inactivity. Movement patterns did not appear to be restricted by social interactions for any group size. Rather, the physical presence of group mates at even a relatively low density of 6.7 birds/m2 appeared to act as a barrier to group dispersal and movement. Group size had little effect on young domestic fowl. Overall, this project has shown that for young domestic fowl the most relevant factors to overall space use are the amount of space available and enclosure design.