Abordagem multicritério de apoio a decisões estrategicamente sustentáveis nas organizações/Multicriteria approach to support strategically sustainable decisions in organizations

Keeping the social and environmental conditions in a favorable conservation status for allowing the society to develop itself without restrictions is the central idea which underpins the sustainability concept. Different spheres such as media, academia and business organizations started to give more...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista produção online Vol. 15; no. 3; p. 925
Main Authors: Victor Diogho Heuer de Carvalho, Poleto, Thiago, Silva, Lucio Camara e, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa
Format: Journal Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Florianopolis Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção - ABEPRO, Revista Produção Online 01-01-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Keeping the social and environmental conditions in a favorable conservation status for allowing the society to develop itself without restrictions is the central idea which underpins the sustainability concept. Different spheres such as media, academia and business organizations started to give more importance to the study of sustainability, once it directly affects aspects that influence the economy in the world. Organizationally, the use of sustainable strategies can bring returns in favor of a healthy development and a conscious culture about the waste as well as reflecting how organizations connect with society and the environment. The objective of this work is to propose a model for prioritizing strategies to support the creation of an environment and a culture based on sustainability in organizations. This model has four steps, beginning with the problem structuring, including the definition of criteria and alternatives, the application of a multi-criteria method for prioritization, and finally, the implementation of the alternatives according to the decision maker opinion as well as on prioritization results.
ISSN:1676-1901
1676-1901
DOI:10.14488/1676-1901.v15i3.1937