A Comparison of the Validity of Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Urine Samples II: Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, (±)-3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine, (±)-3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, (±)-3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine, Phencyclidine, and (±)-11-nor-9-Carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabino

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of analytical toxicology Vol. 34; no. 8; pp. 430 - 443
Main Authors:	STOUT, Peter R, BYNUM, Nichole D, LEWALLEN, Cynthia M, MITCHELL, John M, BAYLOR, Michael R, ROPERO-MILLER, Jeri D
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Niles, IL Preston Publications 2010
Subjects:	Biological and medical sciences Drug addictions Medical sciences Toxicology Amphetamine derivatives Solid phase extraction Biological fluid Tandem mass spectrometry Chemical analysis Metabolite Psychotropic Metamfetamine HPLC chromatography Glutamate receptor Cannabinoid Chemical enrichment Phencyclidine Sample preparation Anesthetic Piperidine derivatives Hallucinogen Amfetamine Drug of abuse Antagonist Quantitative analysis Urine Validation CNS stimulant Coupled method Elimination Neuroprotective agent Sympathomimetic Gas chromatography NMDA receptor Mass spectrometry Comparative study
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
ISSN:	0146-4760 1945-2403