900TiPA phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy

Abstract Background Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is a potentially curative option for patients with rising PSA (biochemical recurrence) after radical prostatectomy. Recently, success rates of SRT were significantly improved through the use of concomitant anti-androgen (AAT) or androgen-deprivation (AD...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of oncology Vol. 30; no. Supplement_5
Main Authors: Dirix, P, Strijbos, M, Fransis, K, Liefhooghe, N, Bruwaene, S Van, Uvin, P, Ghysel, C, Ost, D, Engels, B, den Begin, R Van, Otte, F-X, Roumeguere, T, Palumbo, S, Neybuch, Y, Fonteyne, V, Renard, L, Everaerts, W, Tombal, B, Ost, P, Dirix, L Y
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 01-10-2019
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is a potentially curative option for patients with rising PSA (biochemical recurrence) after radical prostatectomy. Recently, success rates of SRT were significantly improved through the use of concomitant anti-androgen (AAT) or androgen-deprivation (ADT) therapy. In RTOG 96-01, 2 years of bicalutamide 150 mg resulted in a 5% OS benefit at 12-years. In GETUG-AFU 16, 5-year progression-free survival was significantly improved when SRT was combined with 6 months of an LHRH agonist. Based on GETUG-AFU 16, most European urologists and (radiation) oncologists now combine SRT with at least 6 months of ADT. However, ADT comes with several serious side-effects, both physical (cardiovascular, metabolic, musculoskeletal) and psychological (sexual, emotional and cognitive). Considering RTOG 96-01, and in view of new AAT options, it appears worthwhile to look for alternatives. In that respect, apalutamide (ERLEADA®), a next-generation anti-androgen, is an interesting candidate. Trial design This is a phase II randomized, open-label study comparing SRT in combination with 6 months of LHRH (ant)agonist (arm A) versus 6 cycles of apalutamide 240 mg daily (each cycle is 28 +/- 2 days) (arm B) in hormone-naïve patients with biochemical recurrence (PSA > 0.1 µg/L at least 8 weeks after radical prostatectomy). Patients with severe erectile dysfunction are excluded. All subjects will receive SRT as standard of care and will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to arm A or B. Primary objective is to compare sexual function, based on the EPIC-26 sexual domain score, at 9 months (i.e. 3 months after the end of hormonal treatment). Secondary endpoints include general quality of life (EPIC-26, EORTC QLQ C30 and PR25, FACT-P), acute as well as late toxicity (CTCAE version 5.0), and PSA (complete) response rates (i.e. decline from baseline in PSA level of 80% (90%) or greater). The trial was approved by the local ethics committee on April 2nd 2019 and started recruiting immediately thereafter. Clinical trial identification NCT03899077; 2018-004365-13. Legal entity responsible for the study GZA Hospitals. Funding Janssen. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdz248.057