Anodic polarization of stainless steel alloys in molten NaNO3KNO3 eutectic mixture

This article presents the galvanostatic anodic oxidation of two types of stainless steel alloys, ferritic 15.03 Cr and austenitic 20.45 Cr, 8.37 Ni, in molten NaNO3KNO3 eutectic mixture at different temperatures ranging from 673873K. At a temperature of 673K the shape of polarization curves for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anti-corrosion methods and materials Vol. 48; no. 2; pp. 99 - 107
Main Authors: AbdelHakim Ali, H.A., Attia, A.A., AlMasri, A.N., Baraka, A.M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: MCB UP Ltd 01-04-2001
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article presents the galvanostatic anodic oxidation of two types of stainless steel alloys, ferritic 15.03 Cr and austenitic 20.45 Cr, 8.37 Ni, in molten NaNO3KNO3 eutectic mixture at different temperatures ranging from 673873K. At a temperature of 673K the shape of polarization curves for the alloys is complex, while at higher temperatures it is simple. The passivity potential range was calculated as the difference between the passivation potential, Ep, and the breakdown potential, Eb. The value of Eb Ep decreases with the increase of temperature. The amount of iron, chromium and nickel dissolved in the melt was determined after each experiment using atomic absorption spectroscopy. The composition and structure of the corrosion products formed on the surface of electrodes were examined by Xray diffraction analysis. Corrosion parameters derived from the polarization curves are calculated these are polarization resistance at low current densities, Rp, exchange current density, io, corrosion current density, icorr, passivation current density, ip. It was found that the increase of temperature increases io, icorr, and ip while Rp, decreases. From these results it was found that, under the given conditions, the austenitic stainless steel alloy is more corrosion resistant than the ferritic one. The activation energy of corrosion was estimated for the two alloys.
Bibliography:filenameID:1280480202
istex:8D017DFAC46A85AA2F1C24DBEC0516F51BCF352A
ark:/67375/4W2-01JTL08X-9
href:00035590110384083.pdf
original-pdf:1280480202.pdf
ISSN:0003-5599
DOI:10.1108/00035590110384083