Criticizing the Others or Ourselves? The MacIntyre-Winch Debate and the Idea of Social Criticism

MacIntyre states in his criticism of Winch’s Idea of Social Science… that it is impossible to criticize the practices of societies with different forms of rationality in terms of their own forms of rationality;  these practices must be intelligible within our own rationality. In this way he assumes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forum oświatowe Vol. 30; no. 2(58); pp. 35 - 44
Main Author: Lotar Rasiński
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: University of Lower Silesia 01-12-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:MacIntyre states in his criticism of Winch’s Idea of Social Science… that it is impossible to criticize the practices of societies with different forms of rationality in terms of their own forms of rationality;  these practices must be intelligible within our own rationality. In this way he assumes that the only possible way to criticize other cultures is a “view from outside.” Responding  MacIntyre, Winch states that every criticism of other cultures requires “extending of our own ability of understanding.” This seems to suggest that the only possible criticism is the “critique of ourselves.” This paper attempts to support Winch’s position with political argumentation. It refers to the Walzer-Said debate to demonstrate that the logic of social criticism requires reference to the political dimension of domination and the associated concept of emancipation.
ISSN:0867-0323
2450-3452