Criticizing the Others or Ourselves? The MacIntyre-Winch Debate and the Idea of Social Criticism
MacIntyre states in his criticism of Winch’s Idea of Social Science… that it is impossible to criticize the practices of societies with different forms of rationality in terms of their own forms of rationality; these practices must be intelligible within our own rationality. In this way he assumes...
Saved in:
Published in: | Forum oświatowe Vol. 30; no. 2(58); pp. 35 - 44 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Lower Silesia
01-12-2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | MacIntyre states in his criticism of Winch’s Idea of Social Science… that it is impossible to criticize the practices of societies with different forms of rationality in terms of their own forms of rationality; these practices must be intelligible within our own rationality. In this way he assumes that the only possible way to criticize other cultures is a “view from outside.” Responding MacIntyre, Winch states that every criticism of other cultures requires “extending of our own ability of understanding.” This seems to suggest that the only possible criticism is the “critique of ourselves.” This paper attempts to support Winch’s position with political argumentation. It refers to the Walzer-Said debate to demonstrate that the logic of social criticism requires reference to the political dimension of domination and the associated concept of emancipation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0867-0323 2450-3452 |