Critical Review of the Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Presidential Threshold

This article aims to enrich the literature on the threshold for presidential candidacy in Indonesia by: Firstly, summarizing the main criticisms of its implementation; Secondly, refuting the arguments of the Constitutional Court regarding the threshold’s potential to increase political support for t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20; no. 4
Main Authors: Denny Indra Sukmawan, Syaugi Pratama
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 01-12-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article aims to enrich the literature on the threshold for presidential candidacy in Indonesia by: Firstly, summarizing the main criticisms of its implementation; Secondly, refuting the arguments of the Constitutional Court regarding the threshold’s potential to increase political support for the elected President and reduce the number of political parties. This research employs a qualitative methodology, utilizing a literature study design and case studies involving the Constitutional Court’s decisions on the presidential candidacy threshold, along with previous studies on the relationship between political parties and the President. In general, we have found that the primary criticisms of setting the presidential candidacy threshold revolve around its potentially unconstitutional implementation and its contribution to political oligarchy. In practice, setting the presidential candidacy threshold is entirely unrelated to an increase in political support for the President and cannot reduce the number of political parties.
ISSN:1829-7706
2548-1657
DOI:10.31078/jk2041