A Brief Analysis of Information Science Periodicals about the Identity and Social Representation Theories

Based on an interdisciplinary view of the field of Science, Technology and Society (STS), we aim to understand the approaches to the Identity and Social Representation Theory in the Information Science field, by analyzing periodicals in this area. We evaluated scientific journals classified as Quali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 243 - 260
Main Authors: Ana Paula Meneses Alves, Márcia Niituma Ogata, Wilson José Alves Pedro
Format: Journal Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Maria Lúcia Ribeiro 01-12-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Based on an interdisciplinary view of the field of Science, Technology and Society (STS), we aim to understand the approaches to the Identity and Social Representation Theory in the Information Science field, by analyzing periodicals in this area. We evaluated scientific journals classified as Qualis A National, according to the CAPES concept, following pre-determined criteria. Once the articles were located, an analysis was performed, not only checking the theoretical approaches, but also considering the specificities, pluralities, dynamics and complexities of each approach. Eight articles were recovered. In relation to Identity, it is possible to verify that none of the identified articles was based on the same theoretical references that we have used (Ciampa). In relation to the theory of Social Representation, all the selected articles are in accordance with our theoretical approach (Moscovici). From the methodological point of view, a series of procedures were used, many of them reconsidering the interdisciplinary matter and the resulting advantages from interactions between areas. Qualitative nature research was the most used in the articles. Concerning data analysis, we emphasize the Lefévre and Lefévre Collective Subjective Discourse technique. The most used assessment tools were questionnaires and interviews. In this study it was possible to understand and reaffirm that these areas have much to contribute and add each other.
ISSN:1415-3580
2527-2675
DOI:10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2009.v12i2.170