Superstition, Idolatry and the Advancement of Learning
In this article, I offer a survey of Bacon’s use of the term superstition, tracing the evolution of his views on the matter, as well as the articulation of what I call a “problem of su- perstition.” The problem of superstition regards the discipline of assent, but also the formation of a certain cap...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Lexicon philosophicum (Online) no. 9; pp. 11 - 32 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | German |
| Published: |
ILIESI
01-12-2022
|
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In this article, I offer a survey of Bacon’s use of the term superstition, tracing the evolution of his views on the matter, as well as the articulation of what I call a “problem of su- perstition.” The problem of superstition regards the discipline of assent, but also the formation of a certain capacity of distinguishing truth from “superstition and impostures.” In his early writings, Bacon suggested that certain forms of knowledge can cure superstition and entitle a select group to become “sons of science.” I claim that Bacon abandoned this solution. Instead, in his late writings, the recipe from keeping superstition at bay is based on collaborative prac- tices of what I will call “externalizing assent”. I show how such mechanisms of externalizing assent are vividly illustrated in Bacon’s description of the ranks and functions of Salomon’s House, the blueprint institution for the production of knowledge. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2283-7833 |