An Investigation into Motivational Interview Training on Cognitive Regulation and Students’ Academic Engagement

Introduction: Motivational interview is a referential approach and guidance to enhance the internal motivation for change through discovery, identification, solving doubts, and bias. Cognitive regulation of academic excitement and conflict is related to motivation and is one of the problems of stude...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Majallah-i Īrānī āmūzish dar ʻulūm-i pizishkī = Iranian journal of medical education Vol. 21; pp. 443 - 451
Main Authors: Sajjad Panahi Far, Zhila Maheri
Format: Journal Article
Language:Persian
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Medical Education Development Center 01-04-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Motivational interview is a referential approach and guidance to enhance the internal motivation for change through discovery, identification, solving doubts, and bias. Cognitive regulation of academic excitement and conflict is related to motivation and is one of the problems of students with academic failure that can have negative and irreparable consequences for these students. This study endeavored to investigate the effectiveness of training of motivational interviewing training on cognitive-emotional ordering and academic engagement of students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental, pre-test, post-test and control group. The population was all students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in the academic year of 2019. Using randomized sampling method, 30 students were selected and randomly assigned to experimental (15 subjects) and control (15 persons) groups. Then, cognitive-emotional ordering questionnaires and educational conflict were used as a pre-test for both groups. Motivational interview training was applied to the experimental group in 6 sessions. At the end of the course, both groups completed the above questionnaires as a post-test. Data were analyzed using covariance analysis. Results: The descriptive findings of the mean (standard deviation) for the cognitive regulation variable in the pre-test stage of the experimental group were 51.23±5.72, in the post-test was 75.12±5.59 and for the academic engagement in the pretest stage of the experimental group was 75.33±5.89, and the posttest of the experimental group was 96. 46±5. 68 (P =0.002). Conclusion: Regarding the effectiveness of motivational interview training, it is recommended to use the cognitive emotional order of students to improve their academic status.
ISSN:1608-9359
1735-8892