Prostaglandin E1 administration post liver transplantation and renal outcomes: A retrospective single center experience

• Published in: World journal of transplantation Vol. 14; no. 4
• Main Authors: Jahagirdar, Vinay, Ahmed, Mohamed, Fatima, Ifrah, Ali, Hassam, Alba, Laura, Helzberg, John H, Cummings, Lee S, Wilkinson, Matthew, Forster, Jameson, Likhitsup, Alisa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 18-12-2024
• ISSN: 2220-3230; 2220-3230
• DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.98797

BACKGROUND
Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), or alprostadil, is a potent vasodilator that improves hepatic blood flow and reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury post-liver transplantation (LT). However, the benefits of PGE1 on renal function after LT have not yet been well described.
AIM
To assess the impact of PGE1 administration on renal function in patients who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplant.
METHODS
This retrospective study included all patients who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplant at our institution from January, 2011 to December, 2021. Patients were classified based on whether they received PGE1. PGE1 was administered post-LT to those with transaminases > 1000 U/L in the immediate postoperative period. Demographics, post-LT treatments and/or complications, renal function, and survival were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, and a two-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 145 patients underwent LT, with 44 (30%) receiving PGE1. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable, except the PGE1 group had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (1961.9 U/L ± 1862.3 U/L vs 878 U/L ± 741.4 U/L, P = 0.000), alanine aminotransferase (1070.6 U/L ± 895 U/L vs 547.7 U/L ± 410 U/L, P = 0.000), international normalized ratio on post-LT day 1 (2 ± 0.74 vs 1.8 ± 0.4, P = 0.03), a longer intensive care unit stay (8.1 days ± 11.8 days vs 3.8 days ± 4.6 days, P = 0.003), more vasopressor use (55.53 hours ± 111 hours vs 16.33 hours ± 26.3 hours, P = 0.002), and higher immediate postoperative complications (18.6% vs 4.9%, P = 0.04). The PGE1 group also had a significantly higher 90-day readmission rate (29.6% vs 13.1%, P = 0.02) and lower 1-year liver graft survival (87.5% vs 98.9%, P = 0.005). However, 30-day readmission (31.6% vs 27.4%, P = 0.64), LT complications (hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary complications, rejection of liver graft, cardiomyopathy), 1-year patient survival (96.9% vs 97.8%, P = 0.77), overall liver graft survival, and overall patient survival were similar between the two groups (95.4% vs 93.9%, P = 0.74 and 88.4% vs 86.9%, P = 0.81 respectively). Although the PGE1 group had a significantly lower glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on post-LT day 7 (46.3 mL/minute ± 26.7 mL/minute vs 62.5 mL/minute ± 34 mL/minute, P = 0.009), the eventual need for renal replacement therapy (13.6% vs 5.9%, P = 0.09), the number of dialysis sessions (0.91 vs 0.27, P = 0.13), and eGFR at 1-month (37.2 mL/minute ± 35.9 mL/minute vs 42 mL/minute ± 36.9 mL/minute, P = 0.49), 6-months (54.8 mL/minute ± 21.6 mL/minute vs 62 mL/minute ± 21.4 mL/minute, P = 0.09), and 12-months (63.7 mL/minute ± 20.7 mL/minute vs 62.8 mL/minute ± 20.3 mL/minute, P = 0.85) post-LT were similar to those in the non-PGE1 group.
CONCLUSION
In patients who received PGE1 for ischemia-reperfusion injury, despite immediate acute renal injury post-LT, the renal function at 1-month, 6-months, and 12-months post-LT was similar compared to those without ischemia-reperfusion injury. Prospective clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the benefits of PGE1 use in renal function.