Mortality risk in patients with carotid artery disease undergoing carotid endarterectomy compared to the general population

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 45; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Di Venanzio, L, Mahmoudi Hamidabad, N, Lewis, B R, Tiwari, A, Rajai, N, Copley, E A, Rajotia, A, Lutgens, E, Lerman, L O, Nardi, V, Lerman, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 28-10-2024
• ISSN: 0195-668X; 1522-9645
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2294

Abstract Background Patients with carotid artery disease undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) appear to be at high risk of all-cause mortality during their follow-up. However, the possible predictors of this adverse outcome are not elucidated yet. Purpose We aimed to test cardiovascular (CV) risk factors as possible predictors of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing CEA and to determine whether there is a difference between the mortality rate of our study cohort and the general population. We hypothesize that CEA-treated patients have a higher mortality rate during follow-up after surgery than the general population, which is not related to the presence of CV risk factors. Methods We prospectively enrolled and followed up patients undergoing CEA. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression were performed to test whether common CV risk factors (demographics, laboratory values, comorbidities, and events before CEA) were predictive of all-cause mortality. We then compared the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of our population and the age-sex-matched Minnesota (MN) general population at 5,10, and 21 years of follow-up after CEA. Results A total of 710 patients were followed for a median of 7.1 [2.9-11.9] years after CEA. Mortality occurred in 198 (27.0%) patients during the follow-up. The median time to event was 11.0 [10.0-12.0] years. Age was the only predictor of all-cause mortality in CEA-treated patients in multivariable models adjusted for known CV risk factors (Model 1: HR 1.03 [95%CI 1.01-1.06]; p=0.004; Model 2: HR 1.02 [95%CI 1.00-1.04]; p=0.023) (Table 1). However, the CEA-treated group had a higher mortality rate than would have been expected in the MN population (log-rank p<0.001) (Fig.1A). Compared to the MN population, at 5 years of follow-up only patients <60 years old had a higher SMR (4.53 [1.95-8.92]; p=0.001), whereas, at 10 years and 21 years of follow-up, our study population had a higher mortality rate at any age (Fig.1B). Conclusions The elevated mortality risk post-CEA in our cohort cannot be solely attributed to chronological aging. The underlying process of atherosclerosis likely contributes to all-cause mortality, and plaque characteristics may offer additional insight into the risk stratification of this patient group.All cause mortality predictors after CEAStudy population vs. MN population SMR