Платон и Юм: к структуре аргумента от господина и раба в диалоге «Парменид

The authors attempt to expand the view of the well-known argument from Master and Slave through the prism of comparing the method of analysis of causality in Plato and Hume. We try to demonstrate a certain similarity of the logic of the proof adopted by two philosophers, as well as the research pros...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	SHOLE. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassičeskaâ tradiciâ Vol. XIV; no. 1; pp. 257 - 266
Main Authors:	Svetlov, Roman, Korochkin, Fedor
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	Russian
Published:	Новосибирский государственный университет 2020 Novosibirsk State University
Subjects:	Ancient Philosphy Epistemology Logic casuality empiricism Hume the Parmenides dialogue argument from Master and Slave Plato antique skepticism skepticism
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	The authors attempt to expand the view of the well-known argument from Master and Slave through the prism of comparing the method of analysis of causality in Plato and Hume. We try to demonstrate a certain similarity of the logic of the proof adopted by two philosophers, as well as the research prospects that such a comparison opens up. In particular, it shows the grounds on which a skeptical tendency arises in the Academy.
ISSN:	1995-4328