Harriton v Stephens : life, logic and legal fictions

Harriton v Stephens : life, logic and legal fictions

Analysis of the findings in Harriton - asserted inconsistency between actions for wrongful life and tort principles that govern the relationship between a pregnant woman and her doctor - wrongful actions regarding underlying objectives of tort law.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Sydney law review Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 545 - 560
Main Author: Alice GREY
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-09-2006
Subjects:
DUTY OF CARE
MEDICAL LAW
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE
TORTS
UNBORN CHILD
AUSTRALIA
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Analysis of the findings in Harriton - asserted inconsistency between actions for wrongful life and tort principles that govern the relationship between a pregnant woman and her doctor - wrongful actions regarding underlying objectives of tort law.
Bibliography:2008-01-21T19:31:10+11:00
SYDNEY LAW REVIEW, Vol. 28, No. 3, September 2006: 545-560
SLR.jpg
SYDNEY LAW REVIEW, Vol. 28, No. 3, September 2006, 545-560
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
ISSN:0082-0512