Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: Current Management

Background: Management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis can be problematic, and current guidelines are limited by scant evidence. Method: The authors found no research on how clinicians manage this condition and whether existing guidelines were followed. To ascertain how recurrent vulvovaginal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian family physician Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 149 - 151
Main Authors: Watson, Cathy, Pirotta, Marie
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Australia Copyright Agency Limited (Distributor) 01-03-2011
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis can be problematic, and current guidelines are limited by scant evidence. Method: The authors found no research on how clinicians manage this condition and whether existing guidelines were followed. To ascertain how recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis is managed in current clinical practice, a survey was conducted of delegates at a seminar for health professionals with a special interest in vulval conditions. Results: Of the 160 delegates 66 completed the survey, providing a response rate of 41%. The authors found little adherence to current guidelines - only 50% reported using the recommended suppression and maintenance therapy, and only 57% reported using confirmatory diagnostic testing. Discussion: The wide variation in health professionals' management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis reflects the difficulty in treating and managing this condition. The results suggest that clinicians are 'tailoring' treatment to their patients due to a lack of good evidence of effective treatments to guide them.
Bibliography:AFP.jpg
Australian Family Physician, Vol. 40, No. 3, Mar 2011: 149-151
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0300-8495
2208-7958