Crystal and molecular structure of [Ni{2‐H2NC(=O)C5H4N}2(H2O)2][Ni{2,6‐(O2C)2C5H3N}2]·4.67H2O; DFT studies on hydrogen bonding energies in the crystal

[Ni{2‐H2NC(=O)C5H4N}2(H2O)2][Ni{2,6‐(O2C)2C5H3N}2]·4.67H2O, a new complex salt containing a bis(2,6‐dicarboxypyridine)nickel(II) anion and a bis(2‐amidopyridine)diaquanickel(II) cation, was synthesized and characterized. The crystal is stabilized by an extensive network of hydrogen bonds. Alternate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials Vol. 76; no. 4; pp. 591 - 603
Main Authors: Chahkandi, Mohammad, Keivanloo Shahrestanaki, Abolfazl, Mirzaei, Masoud, Nawaz Tahir, Muhammad, Mague, Joel T.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 5 Abbey Square, Chester, Cheshire CH1 2HU, England International Union of Crystallography 01-08-2020
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Ni{2‐H2NC(=O)C5H4N}2(H2O)2][Ni{2,6‐(O2C)2C5H3N}2]·4.67H2O, a new complex salt containing a bis(2,6‐dicarboxypyridine)nickel(II) anion and a bis(2‐amidopyridine)diaquanickel(II) cation, was synthesized and characterized. The crystal is stabilized by an extensive network of hydrogen bonds. Alternate layers of anions and cations/water molecules parallel to (010) can be distinguished. Computational studies of the network packing of the title compound by high‐level DFT‐D/B3LYP calculations indicate stabilization of the networks with conventional and non‐conventional intermolecular O—H…O, N—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen bonds along with π‐stacking contacts. Due to the presence of water molecules and the importance of forming hydrogen bonds with the involvement of water clusters to the stability of the crystal packing, the importance and role of these water clusters, and the quantitative stability resulting from the formation of hydrogen bonds and possibly other noncovalent bonds such as π‐stacking are examined. The binding energies obtained by DFT‐D calculations for these contacts indicate that hydrogen bonds, especially O—H…O and N—H…O, control the construction of the crystalline packing. Additionally, the results of Bader's theory of AIM for these interactions agree reasonably well with the calculated energies. Computational studies of the network packing of the title compound by high level DFT‐D/B3LYP calculations indicate stabilization of the networks with conventional and non‐conventional intermolecular O—H…O, N—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen bonds (HBs) along with π‐stacking contacts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2052-5206
2052-5192
2052-5206
DOI:10.1107/S2052520620006472