Detection of disturbances in pulmonary gas exchanges during exercise from arterialized earlobe Po2

Blood sampling from the arterialized earlobe is widely used in clinical exercise testing but Fajac et al. (1998) (Eur. Respir. J. 11, 712-715) have shown that arterialized P(O2) Pc(CO2) is not a valid surrogate for Pa(O2). In the present study, in order to detect disturbances in pulmonary gas exchan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respiratory physiology & neurobiology Vol. 177; no. 1; pp. 30 - 35
Main Authors: AGUILANIU, Bernard, MAITRE, Jocelyne, DIAB, Samia, PERRAULT, Helene, PERONNET, François
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier 30-06-2011
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Blood sampling from the arterialized earlobe is widely used in clinical exercise testing but Fajac et al. (1998) (Eur. Respir. J. 11, 712-715) have shown that arterialized P(O2) Pc(CO2) is not a valid surrogate for Pa(O2). In the present study, in order to detect disturbances in pulmonary gas exchanges during clinical exercise testing from the alveolar-arterial gradient of P(O2) (P[Ai-a](O2)), a correction factor for Pc(O2) was validated from data on a large cohort (107 patients at one or two levels of exercise: 172 pairs of samples). Pulmonary gas exchanges and pH, P(O2), P(CO2), PA(iO2) and P(Ai-a)(O2) from arterial and arterialized blood were measured or computed. Arterial and arterialized pH and P(CO2) (and thus PA(iO2)) were similar but P(CO2) was lower than arterial P(O2) (Pa(O2)). However, when corrected for the systematic bias between Pa(O2) and Pc(O2), which increased with Pc(O2), Pc(O2) adequately detected disturbances in pulmonary gas exchanges with a very high sensibility and specificity (predictive values of a negative or positive test ∼95%).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1569-9048
1878-1519
DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2011.03.005