A Comparative Study of Colpocleisis vs. Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse

• Published in: The Israel Medical Association journal Vol. 25; no. 12; pp. 842 - 846
• Main Authors: Sadeh, Rotem, Schmidt, Meirav, Hod, Yael, Zilberlicht, Ariel, Feferkorn, Ido, Haya, Nir, Abramov, Yoram
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Israel 01-12-2022
• Subjects: Aged; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Hysterectomy; Hysterectomy, Vaginal - adverse effects; Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Vagina - surgery
• ISSN: 1565-1088

Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and colpocleisis are both used for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
To compare short- and long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy vs. colpocleisis for advanced POP.
Hospital and outpatient charts of patients who underwent VH or colpocleisis at our institution between January 2006 and December 2015 were reviewed. Clinical data were obtained and analyzed.
In this study, 188 patients underwent VH and 32 patients underwent colpocleisis. The colpocleisis group was significantly older than the VH group (79.5 ± 4.5 vs. 69 ± 6.1 years respectively, P < 0.0001) and presented with significantly higher co-morbidity rates and a higher degree of POP. Perioperative blood loss was significantly lower (250 ± 7.6 ml vs. 300 ± 115 ml, P < 0.0001) and postoperative hospitalization was significantly shorter (2 ± 2.7 vs. 3 ± 2.2 days, P = 0.015) among the colpocleisis group. None of the patients from the colpocleisis group required an indwelling urethral catheter after discharge, compared to 27.5% of the patients from the VH group (P = 0.001). Total postoperative complication rate was significantly lower among the colpocleisis group (25% vs. 31% P < 0.0001). Objective recurrence of POP was significantly more common among the VH group (7% vs. 0% and 21% vs. 0% for the anterior and posterior compartments, respectively, P = 0.04).
Colpocleisis is associated with faster recovery, lower perioperative morbidity, and higher success rates than VH and should be considered for frail and elderly patients.