Does preoperative use of silodosin affect the stages of F-URS procedure?

• Published in: Archivos españoles de urología Vol. 73; no. 1; p. 47
• Main Authors: Köprü, Burak, Ebiloğlu, Turgay, Kaya, Engin, Zor, Murat, Bedir, Selahattin, Topuz, Bahadır, Sarikaya, Selçuk, Ergin, Giray, Yalçin, Serdar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Spain 01-01-2020
• Subjects: Humans; Indoles; Kidney Calculi - therapy; Lithotripsy; Male; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Ureteral Calculi - therapy; Ureteroscopy; Silodosina; F-URS; Silodosin
• ISSN: 0004-0614

To evaluate the effect of silodosin on stages of the flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) procedures.
Between November 2015 and August 2017, a total of 76 patients suffering from 10-30 mm kidney stone were enrolled in this randomized prospective study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups for treatment: Group 1 had F-URS with preoperative daily uptake of 8 mg silodosin for 10 days, and group 2 had F-URS without silodosin uptake. None of the patients had preoperative JJ stenting. Stages of the F-URS was defined as entrance to bladder time (ETBT) with a semirigid ureterorenoscope (R-URS), entrance to ureteric orifice time (ETUOT) with R-URS using a guide wire and proceeding 2 cm inside the ureter, application of access sheath time (AAST) using the guide wire advanced through R-URS, F-URS time (FURST) + lithotripsy with laser time (LT), and total operation time (OT). We compared the time of each stage between two groups.
There were 38 patients group1 and 2, respectively. There was one ureteral access sheath (UAS) application failure in group 1, and 3 failures in group 2 (p=0.307). The ETBT, ETUOT, and AAST were significantly short in group 1 than group 2 (p=0.001,0.007,0.002).
Although preoperative use of silodosin facilitated only an insignificant positive effect on UAS placement failure, it eased the F-URS procedure by reducing the ETBT, ETUOT, and AAST in seconds. More studies are needed to make an exact conclusion.