Multidisciplinary approach to abdominal wall reconstruction after decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome

• Published in: Annals of plastic surgery Vol. 54; no. 3; pp. 269 - 75; discussion 275
• Main Authors: Hultman, C Scott, Pratt, Broc, Cairns, Bruce A, McPhail, Lindsee, Rutherford, Edmund J, Rich, Preston B, Baker, Christopher C, Meyer, Anthony A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-03-2005
• Subjects: Abdomen; Abdominal Wall - surgery; Adult; Aged; Compartment Syndromes - surgery; Decompression, Surgical; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Laparotomy - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Care Team; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods; Recurrence
• ISSN: 0148-7043
• DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000153084.02657.61

Decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome has been shown to reduce mortality in critically ill patients, but little is known about the outcome of abdominal wall reconstruction. This study investigates the role of plastic surgeons in the management and reconstruction of these abdominal wall defects.
We performed a retrospective review of 82 consecutive critically ill patients who underwent decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome, at a university level 1 trauma center, from April 2000 to May 2004. Patients reconstructed by trauma surgeons alone (n = 15) were compared with patients reconstructed jointly with plastic surgeons (n = 12), using Student t test and chi analysis.
Eighty-two patients underwent decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome, yielding 50 survivors (61%). Of the 27 patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction, 6 had early primary fascial repair, and 21 had staged reconstruction with primary fascial closure (n = 4), components separation alone (n = 3), components separation with mesh (n = 10), or permanent mesh only (n = 4). Compared with patients whose reconstruction was performed by trauma surgeons, patients who underwent a combined approach with plastic surgeons were older (50.5 versus 31.7 years, P < 0.05), had more comorbidities (P < 0.001), were less likely to have a traumatic etiology (P < 0.001), had a longer delay to reconstruction (407 versus 119 days, P < 0.05), and were more likely to undergo components separation (P < 0.05). Mean follow-up of 11.5 months revealed 2 recurrent hernias in the combined reconstruction group, both of which were successfully repaired.
A multidisciplinary approach is essential to the successful management of abdominal wall defects after decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome. Although carefully selected patients can undergo early primary fascial repair, most of reconstructed patients had staged closure of the abdominal wall via components separation, with a low rate of recurrent hernia. High-risk patients with large defects and comorbidities appear to benefit from the involvement of a plastic surgeon.