Implementation of systems strategies for breast and cervical cancer screening services in health maintenance organizations

• Published in: The American journal of managed care Vol. 9; no. 11; pp. 745 - 755
• Main Authors: Goins, Karin Valentine, Zapka, Jane G, Geiger, Ann M, Solberg, Leif I, Taplin, Stephen, Yood, Marianne Ulcickas, Gilbert, Joyce, Mouchawar, Judy, Somkin, Carol P, Weinmann, Sheila
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-11-2003
• Subjects: Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis; Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control; Decision Support Systems, Clinical; Female; Health administration; Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration; Health Maintenance Organizations - standards; Humans; Leadership; Mass Screening - utilization; Organizational Case Studies; Organizational Policy; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Self Care; United States; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control; United States
• ISSN: 1088-0224

To describe the systems strategies used to reduce failures in delivery of breast and cervical cancer screening services in HMOs with high performance rates for these services.
Multiple case study.
Seven HMOs participated in an assessment of their breast and cervical cancer screening policies and procedures. Current clinical practice guidelines were analyzed, and key informants were interviewed about organizational policies and procedures that ensure initial screening and follow-up of abnormal results. Data were analyzed across plans for several theoretically relevant domains, including leadership and policies, clinical decision support, delivery system design, clinical information systems, and patient self-management support.
Practice guidelines were fundamentally similar across plans for both cancer screenings, although operationalization of risk and formatting of the written documents differed. These plans adopted a wide array of strategies, particularly in the clinical decision support, clinical information systems, and patient self-management support domains, but there is room for improvement. Differences among plans and between strategies for breast and cervical cancer screening provide new understanding of how to approach this problem.
Organizations seeking to improve performance of breast and cervical cancer screening should consider multiple strategies aimed at multiple targets and should ensure that strategies used for one type of cancer are considered for others.