Retinotopic organization of the primary visual cortex of flying foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus and Pteropus scapulatus)

• Published in: Journal of comparative neurology (1911) Vol. 335; no. 1; p. 55
• Main Authors: Rosa, M G, Schmid, L M, Krubitzer, L A, Pettigrew, J D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-09-1993
• Subjects: Animals; Chiroptera - anatomy & histology; Electrophysiology; Male; Species Specificity; Visual Cortex - anatomy & histology; Visual Pathways - anatomy & histology
• ISSN: 0021-9967
• DOI: 10.1002/cne.903350105

The representation of the visual field in the occipital cortex was studied by multiunit recordings in seven flying foxes (Pteropus spp.), anesthetized with thiopentone/N2O and immobilized with pancuronium bromide. On the basis of its visuotopic organization and architecture, the primary visual area (V1) was distinguished from neighboring areas. Area V1 occupies the dorsal surface of the occipital pole, as well as most of the tentorial surface of the cortex, the posterior third of the mesial surface of the brain, and the upper bank of the posterior portion of the splenial sulcus. In each hemisphere, it contains a precise, visuotopically organized representation of the entire extent of the contralateral visual hemifield. The representation of the vertical meridian, together with 8-15 degrees of ipsilateral hemifield, forms the anterior border of V1 with other visually responsive areas. The representation of the horizontal meridian runs anterolateral to posteromedial, dividing V1 so that the lower visual quadrant is represented medially, and the upper quadrant laterally. The total surface area of V1 is about 140 mm2 for P. poliocephalus, and 110 mm2 for P. scapulatus. The representation of the central visual field is greatly magnified relative to that of the periphery. The cortical magnification factor decreases with increasing eccentricity, following a negative power function. Conversely, receptive field sizes increase markedly with increasing eccentricity, and therefore the point-image size is approximately constant throughout V1. The emphasis in the representation of the area centralis in V1 is much larger than that expected on the basis of ganglion cell counts in flat-mounted retinas. Thus, a larger degree of convergence occurs at the peripheral representations in the retino-geniculo-cortical pathway, in comparison with the central representations. The marked emphasis in the representation of central vision, the wide extent of the binocular field of vision, and the relatively large surface area of V1 reflect the importance of vision in megachiropterans.