Comparison of Different Mechanical Insufflator-Exsufflator Systems by Measurement of the Peak Exspiratory Flow (PEF)

The management of pulmonary secretion in patients with respiratory muscle weakness using mechanical insufflator-exsufflator systems (MIE) is an established treatment option. There are significant differences in the efficiency of different devices in practical use. The intention of this study was to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) Vol. 71; no. 3; p. 166
Main Authors: Schütz, Ansgar, Wagner, Janine, Conrad, Atmungstherapeuten Dgp, Anne, Funke, Andreas
Format: Journal Article
Language:German
Published: Germany 01-03-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The management of pulmonary secretion in patients with respiratory muscle weakness using mechanical insufflator-exsufflator systems (MIE) is an established treatment option. There are significant differences in the efficiency of different devices in practical use. The intention of this study was to evaluate the peak exspiratory flow (PEF) values of different devices with and without use of equipment.  PEFs of ten MIE were investigated in vitro using different equipment.  The efficiency of the devices showed significant differences. The use of two bacterial filters showed a significant reduction of 13 % compared to one filter, the use of a catheter mount revealed a significant reduction of 10 %, with an elbow connector additionally 15 %. With a commonly used equipment (1800 mm tube, one filter, catheter tube with elbow) there was a difference of 58 % between the devices Nippy (2,86 l/s) and Pulsar (1,2 l/s). There are significant differences in PEF of different MIE and use of different equipment. That could be of therapeutic relevance. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical relevance of these findings. Recommendations for the use of devices and equipment are necessary to ensure the efficacy of the elimination of pulmonary mucus.
ISSN:1438-8790
DOI:10.1055/s-0042-121822