Predictive factors of third molar eruption
We studied the prognosis of upper and lower third molar evolution. Seventy-eight patients were included after a clinical examination, dental casts, panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs on inclusion (T1) and two years after (T2). Five parameters were studied: retromolar space (RMS) between...
Saved in:
Published in: | Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale Vol. 112; no. 5; pp. 263 - 268 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | French |
Published: |
France
01-11-2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We studied the prognosis of upper and lower third molar evolution.
Seventy-eight patients were included after a clinical examination, dental casts, panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs on inclusion (T1) and two years after (T2). Five parameters were studied: retromolar space (RMS) between the third molar (M3) and the anterior ridge of the ramus; RMS/M3 crown diameter ratio, distances (PTV-M(1)) and (X(i)-Mi(2)); and third molar angle with occlusal plane.
They were noted at T1 and T2. The gain of retromolar space from T1 to T2 reached 1.2 to 2.2mm without extraction, 2 to 2.7mm with PM extraction, and 4.5 to 6.8mm with M1 extraction. The "RMS/M3 diameter" ratio increased in the maxilla from 0.6 to 0.8 and from 0.5 to 0.8 in the mandible (P=0.01) between T1 and T2. PTV-M1 increased significantly from 17.1 to 19.9mm (P<0.001), and Xi-M2i increased significantly from 18.5 to 22.4mm (P<0.001) between T1 and T2.
The extraction of premolars has little influence on the variation of the retromolar space; conversely first molar extraction increases that space. Prognosis techniques for the evolution of third molars are helpful when considering avulsion. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1776-257X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.stomax.2011.05.003 |