Management of Severe Bone Defects in Femoral Revision following Total Hip Arthroplasty

• Published in: Hip & pelvis Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 101 - 107
• Main Authors: Li, Yicheng, Cao, Li
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Hip Society 01-06-2024; 대한고관절학회
• Subjects: Review; 정형외과학; Femur; Bone loss; Revision surgery; Total hip arthroplasty
• ISSN: 2287-3260; 2287-3279
• DOI: 10.5371/hp.2024.36.2.101

Treatment of femoral bone defects continues to be a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA); therefore, meticulous preoperative evaluation of patients and surgical planning are required. This review provides a concise synopsis of the etiology, classification, treatment strategy, and prosthesis selection in relation to femoral bone loss in revision THA. A search of literature was conducted for identification of research articles related to classification of bone loss, management of femoral revision, and comparison of different types of stems. Findings of a thorough review of the included articles were as follows: (1) the Paprosky classification system is used most often when defining femoral bone loss, (2) a primary-length fully coated monoblock femoral component is recommended for treatment of types I or II bone defects, (3) use of an extensively porouscoated stem and a modular fluted tapered stem is recommended for management of types III or IV bone defects, and (4) use of an impaction grafting technique is another option for improvement of bone stock, and allograft prosthesis composite and proximal femoral replacement can be applied by experienced surgeons, in selected cases, as a final salvage solution. Stems with a tapered design are gradually replacing components with a cylindrical design as the first choice for femoral revision; however, further confirmation regarding the advantages and disadvantages of modular and nonmodular stems will be required through conduct of higher-level comparative studies.