CO₂ reduction on pure Cu produces only H₂ after subsurface O is depleted Theory and experiment

We elucidate the role of subsurface oxygen on the production of C₂ products from CO₂ reduction over Cu electrocatalysts using the newly developed grand canonical potential kinetics density functional theory method, which predicts that the rate of C₂ production on pure Cu with no O is ∼500 times slow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 118; no. 23; pp. 1 - 8
Main Authors: Liu, Guiji, Lee, Michelle, Kwon, Soonho, Zeng, Guosong, Eichhorn, Johanna, Buckley, Aya K., Toste, F. Dean, Goddard, William A., Toma, Francesca M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington National Academy of Sciences 08-06-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We elucidate the role of subsurface oxygen on the production of C₂ products from CO₂ reduction over Cu electrocatalysts using the newly developed grand canonical potential kinetics density functional theory method, which predicts that the rate of C₂ production on pure Cu with no O is ∼500 times slower than H₂ evolution. In contrast, starting with Cu₂O, the rate of C₂ production is >5,000 times faster than pure Cu(111) and comparable to H₂ production. To validate these predictions experimentally, we combined time-dependent product detection with multiple characterization techniques to show that ethylene production decreases substantially with time and that a sufficiently prolonged reaction time (up to 20 h) leads only to H₂ evolution with ethylene production ∼1,000 times slower, in agreement with theory. This result shows that maintaining substantial subsurface oxygen is essential for long-term C₂ production with Cu catalysts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by Michael L. Klein, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, and approved April 13, 2021 (received for review June 18, 2020)
1G.L., M.L., and S.K. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: G.L., M.L., S.K., F.D.T., W.A.G., and F.M.T. designed research; G.L., M.L., S.K., and G.Z. performed research; J.E. and A.K.B. performed preliminary measurements; G.L., M.L., S.K., W.A.G., and F.M.T. analyzed the data; and G.L., M.L., S.K., F.D.T., W.A.G., and F.M.T. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2012649118