FOREWORD RIGHTS AS TRUMPS?
Greene discusses in his foreword in the constitutional law that rights are absolute but for the exceptional circumstances in which they may be limited under the first frame. Constitutional adjudication within this frame is primarily an interpretive exercise fixed on identifying the substance and rea...
Saved in:
Published in: | Harvard law review Vol. 132; no. 1; pp. 28 - 132 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge
Harvard Law Review Association
01-11-2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Greene discusses in his foreword in the constitutional law that rights are absolute but for the exceptional circumstances in which they may be limited under the first frame. Constitutional adjudication within this frame is primarily an interpretive exercise fixed on identifying the substance and reach of any constitutional rights at issue. Under the second frame, rights are limited but for the exceptional circumstances in which they are absolute. Adjudication within this frame is primarily an empirical exercise fixed on testing the government's justification for its action. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-811X 2161-976X |