Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradoxes
Since the expressibility of the key notion would generate paradox, they claim that Field's theory is no better off than standard reactions to the paradox: it prevents inconsistency through expressive incompleteness. [...] it appears there was some laxity in proof-reading which resulted in a few...
Saved in:
Published in: | Philosophy Vol. 84; no. 329; pp. 454 - 458 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Book Review |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
Cambridge University Press
01-07-2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Since the expressibility of the key notion would generate paradox, they claim that Field's theory is no better off than standard reactions to the paradox: it prevents inconsistency through expressive incompleteness. [...] it appears there was some laxity in proof-reading which resulted in a few too many typos in places and inconsistent (and partly incorrect) cross-references to papers in the same volume. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-8191 1469-817X |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0031819109000436 |