P-370: Management of high-risk hypertensive patients in Spain. The Tarvest study

Clinical guidelines clearly define the management of high risk hypertensive patients (HRP). Since these recommendations are often poorly followed, we aimed to assess the management of HRP in daily clinical practice. We evaluate two clinical healthcare settings, primary care (PC) and specialist clini...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of hypertension Vol. 18; no. S4; p. 140A
Main Authors: Barrios, Vivencio, Hernandez, Ramon, Ruilope, Luis M., Redon, Josep M., De la Figuera, Mariano, Calderon, Alberto
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-05-2005
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Clinical guidelines clearly define the management of high risk hypertensive patients (HRP). Since these recommendations are often poorly followed, we aimed to assess the management of HRP in daily clinical practice. We evaluate two clinical healthcare settings, primary care (PC) and specialist clinic (SC) in Spain. An epidemiologic crossectional study in hypertensive patients (HP) with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease: coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), peripheral artery disease (PAD) or chronic renal failure (CRF). HRP who fulfilled inclusion criteria were recruited from a registry of the HP attended in an outpatient clinic one day. Data of HRP were collected in a case report form. Quality of the collected data were strictly controlled by an external CRO. Results: Out of the registry of 12964 HP, 5552 were recruited as HRP (age 67 years; 51% men). 2958 (53.4%) from PC and 2564 from SC. 58% diabetics (69.1% PC vs 51% SC; p<0.001); 36% CAD (25.9 vs 47.4; p<0.001); 14% CVD (11.9 vs 15.7; p<0.001); 11% PAD (10.5 vs 11.8; p=ns); 10% CRF (5.2 vs 14.9; p<0.001). Risk factors: 59% sedentarism, 56% dyslipidaemia, 49% obesity; 18% smoking. Mean BP: 145.7/84.4 mmHg; total cholesterol: 208 mg/dl; c-LDL: 128. According to the investigators, 79.3% patients were classified as high risk, 11.9% as very high risk. According to WHO/ISH criteria, 89.4% were very high risk patients (p <0.001). Therapy: 97% antihypertensives, 52% antiplatelets, 47% antidiabetics. Some significant differences were observed between population from PC and SC. Conclusions: Cardiovascular risk is often underestimated. BP and c-LDL controls are very poor and strongly differ from internationally accepted recommendations in HRP. The use of antiplatelets is lower than recommended. All these findings demonstrate that application of guidelines for HRP management is scarce in daily clinical practice in Spain.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-KTJBQ5VB-H
href:18_S4_140A.pdf
istex:D67294060175B67D764C6FA6989D51E1A27493F1
ISSN:0895-7061
1941-7225
1879-1905
DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.03.388