Comparing the van Oosterhout and Chybicki-Burczyk methods of estimating null allele frequencies for inbred populations
In spite of the usefulness of codominant markers in population genetics, the existence of null alleles raises challenging estimation issues in natural populations that are characterized by positive inbreeding coefficients (F > 0). Disregarding the possibility of F > 0 in a population will gene...
Saved in:
Published in: | Molecular ecology resources Vol. 12; no. 6; pp. 975 - 982 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-11-2012
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In spite of the usefulness of codominant markers in population genetics, the existence of null alleles raises challenging estimation issues in natural populations that are characterized by positive inbreeding coefficients (F > 0). Disregarding the possibility of F > 0 in a population will generally lead to overestimates of null allele frequencies. Conversely, estimates of inbreeding coefficients (F) may be strongly biased upwards (excess homozygotes), in the presence of nontrivial frequencies of null alleles. An algorithm has been presented for the estimation of null allele frequencies in inbred populations (van Oosterhout method), using external estimates of the F‐statistics. The goal of this study is to introduce a modification of this method and to provide a formal comparison with an alternative likelihood‐based method (Chybicki‐Burczyk). Using simulated data, we illustrate the strengths and limitations of these competing methods. Under most circumstances, the likelihood method is preferable, but for highly inbred organisms, a modified van Oosterhout method offers some advantages. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Appendix S1 Formal demonstration of the existence of 0, 1 or two solutions in the VO system of equations. Appendix S2 Distribution of null allele frequency used in the simulations. Appendix S3 Method for the numerical optimization of the externally supplied F-estimate. Appendix S4 Comparison of the methods: the modified VO method (VOm) of Van Oosterhout et al. ; and the CB method of Chybicki & Burczyk . ark:/67375/WNG-SW2BRKR9-N istex:927151264AF4EA815B19E2E9AF11C2F08B78C036 US Department of Agriculture and New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station - No. USDA/NJAES-17111; No. NSF-DEB-0514956 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement US National Science Foundation - No. NSF-DEB-0514956 ArticleID:MEN12015 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1755-098X 1755-0998 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1755-0998.12015 |