Comparing the van Oosterhout and Chybicki-Burczyk methods of estimating null allele frequencies for inbred populations

In spite of the usefulness of codominant markers in population genetics, the existence of null alleles raises challenging estimation issues in natural populations that are characterized by positive inbreeding coefficients (F > 0). Disregarding the possibility of F > 0 in a population will gene...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular ecology resources Vol. 12; no. 6; pp. 975 - 982
Main Authors: Campagne, P., Smouse, P. E., Varouchas, G., Silvain, J.-F., Leru, B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-11-2012
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In spite of the usefulness of codominant markers in population genetics, the existence of null alleles raises challenging estimation issues in natural populations that are characterized by positive inbreeding coefficients (F > 0). Disregarding the possibility of F > 0 in a population will generally lead to overestimates of null allele frequencies. Conversely, estimates of inbreeding coefficients (F) may be strongly biased upwards (excess homozygotes), in the presence of nontrivial frequencies of null alleles. An algorithm has been presented for the estimation of null allele frequencies in inbred populations (van Oosterhout method), using external estimates of the F‐statistics. The goal of this study is to introduce a modification of this method and to provide a formal comparison with an alternative likelihood‐based method (Chybicki‐Burczyk). Using simulated data, we illustrate the strengths and limitations of these competing methods. Under most circumstances, the likelihood method is preferable, but for highly inbred organisms, a modified van Oosterhout method offers some advantages.
Bibliography:Appendix S1 Formal demonstration of the existence of 0, 1 or two solutions in the VO system of equations. Appendix S2 Distribution of null allele frequency used in the simulations. Appendix S3 Method for the numerical optimization of the externally supplied F-estimate. Appendix S4 Comparison of the methods: the modified VO method (VOm) of Van Oosterhout et al. ; and the CB method of Chybicki & Burczyk .
ark:/67375/WNG-SW2BRKR9-N
istex:927151264AF4EA815B19E2E9AF11C2F08B78C036
US Department of Agriculture and New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station - No. USDA/NJAES-17111; No. NSF-DEB-0514956
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
US National Science Foundation - No. NSF-DEB-0514956
ArticleID:MEN12015
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1755-098X
1755-0998
DOI:10.1111/1755-0998.12015