Demographics and disease characteristics of patients with psoriasis enrolled in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register

Summary Background The British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) is a prospective, observational cohort designed to assess the long‐term safety of biologic and conventional systemic therapies used for adults with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis in the U.K. and Repub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of dermatology (1951) Vol. 173; no. 2; pp. 510 - 518
Main Authors: Iskandar, I.Y.K., Ashcroft, D.M., Warren, R.B., Yiu, Z.Z.N., McElhone, K., Lunt, M., Barker, J.N.W.N., Burden, A.D., Ormerod, A.D., Reynolds, N.J., Smith, C.H., Griffiths, C.E.M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-08-2015
Oxford University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background The British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) is a prospective, observational cohort designed to assess the long‐term safety of biologic and conventional systemic therapies used for adults with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis in the U.K. and Republic of Ireland. Objectives To describe the demographics, disease severity and comorbidities of patients with psoriasis on enrolment into BADBIR, and to highlight differences in those commencing biologics compared with those on conventional systemic therapies. Methods Baseline data were collected from 151 dermatology departments in the U.K. and Republic of Ireland. Descriptive analysis was conducted. Results As of August 2014, 8399 patients were registered with BADBIR; 5065 (60%) received biologics, of whom 52·8% received adalimumab, 24·6% etanercept, 18·7% ustekinumab and 3·9% infliximab. In the comparator cohort 44·1% received methotrexate, 23·1% ciclosporin, 18·0% acitretin and 7·6% fumaric acid esters. Overall 4897 (58%) were male. Patients on biologics had a higher mean ± SD age and disease duration than patients on conventional systemic therapies (46·3 ± 12·7 vs. 44·3 ± 14·3 years and 23·0 ± 12·6 vs. 19·0 ± 13·4 years, respectively; both P < 0·001). Mean body mass index, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores for patients on biologics were higher than for those on conventional systemic therapies (31·0 ± 7·2 vs. 30·1 ± 7·3 kg m−2; 16·4 ± 8·3 vs. 15·5 ± 7·9 and 17·4 ± 7·5 vs. 15·0 ± 7·1, respectively; all P < 0·001). In total 71% of all patients had comorbidities and 47% had more than one comorbidity. The most frequent comorbidities were obesity (42·1%), hypertension (25·7%), depression (22·1%) and psoriatic arthritis (17·1%). Conclusions BADBIR is an invaluable resource to study the safety and effectiveness of both biologic and conventional systemic therapies. Understanding differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts is crucial in undertaking future pharmacovigilance studies. What's already known about this topic? The baseline demographics of patients with psoriasis commencing biologic therapies are well described in the setting of clinical trials. What does this study add? Data collected by the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register reveal that the demographics (e.g. male‐to‐female ratio), phenotypes of psoriasis and comorbidities of patients with psoriasis commencing conventional systemic or biologic therapies in routine clinical practice in the U.K. and Republic of Ireland are different from those reported in a clinical trial setting.
Bibliography:Schering-Plough
Janssen-Cilag
ark:/67375/WNG-ZGXTX2WZ-6
Celgene
Creabilis
Eli Lilly
Pfizer
NIHR and MRC
istex:FEF979EAA003B6D81CA9B5570DA9AFD3D5F94AA9
AbbVie
Novartis and LEO Pharma Research Foundation
British Association of Dermatologists
Novartis
GSK-Stiefel and LEO Pharma
Janssen
Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag and AbbVie
Stiefel U.K., a GSK company, and AstraZeneca
ArticleID:BJD13908
MSD
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-2
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.13908