Genetic risk factors for insidious equine recurrent uveitis in Appaloosa horses

Summary Appaloosa horses are predisposed to equine recurrent uveitis (ERU), an immune‐mediated disease characterized by recurring inflammation of the uveal tract in the eye, which is the leading cause of blindness in horses. Nine genetic markers from the ECA1 region responsible for the spotted coat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal genetics Vol. 45; no. 3; pp. 392 - 399
Main Authors: Fritz, K. L., Kaese, H. J., Valberg, S. J., Hendrickson, J. A., Rendahl, A. K., Bellone, R. R., Dynes, K. M., Wagner, M. L., Lucio, M. A., Cuomo, F. M., Brinkmeyer-Langford, C. L., Skow, L. C., Mickelson, J. R., Rutherford, M. S., McCue, M. E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Appaloosa horses are predisposed to equine recurrent uveitis (ERU), an immune‐mediated disease characterized by recurring inflammation of the uveal tract in the eye, which is the leading cause of blindness in horses. Nine genetic markers from the ECA1 region responsible for the spotted coat color of Appaloosa horses, and 13 microsatellites spanning the equine major histocompatibility complex (ELA) on ECA20, were evaluated for association with ERU in a group of 53 Appaloosa ERU cases and 43 healthy Appaloosa controls. Three markers were significantly associated (corrected P‐value <0.05): a SNP within intron 11 of the TRPM1 gene on ECA1, an ELA class I microsatellite located near the boundary of the ELA class III and class II regions and an ELA class II microsatellite located in intron 1 of the DRA gene. Association between these three genetic markers and the ERU phenotype was confirmed in a second population of 24 insidious ERU Appaloosa cases and 16 Appaloosa controls. The relative odds of being an ERU case for each allele of these three markers were estimated by fitting a logistic mixed model with each of the associated markers independently and with all three markers simultaneously. The risk model using these markers classified ~80% of ERU cases and 75% of controls in the second population as moderate or high risk, and low risk respectively. Future studies to refine the associations at ECA1 and ELA loci and identify functional variants could uncover alleles conferring susceptibility to ERU in Appaloosa horses.
Bibliography:ArticleID:AGE12129
University of Minnesota Equine Center
Figure S1 Correlations between markers on ECA1. Figure S2 Correlations between markers on ECA20. Figure S3 Predicted amino acid alignment for ELA3.6 locus alleles. Table S1 Markers included in the study. Table S2 Newly discovered microsatellite markers used in this study. Table S3 MHC marker associations in Population 1 after accounting for EqMHC1. Table S4 Genotypic frequencies for each of the three associated markers. Appendix S1 Materials.
US Equestrian Foundation
Minnesota Racing Commission
Bernice Barbour Foundation
Merial Veterinary Summer Scholar funds
istex:C91DC7887271833136C4C0B7C6F81FD5868B04B6
Morris Animal Foundation - No. D10EQ-405
ark:/67375/WNG-0XMT0G44-H
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0268-9146
1365-2052
DOI:10.1111/age.12129