Modelling the cost effectiveness of TNF-α antagonists in the management of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Registry
Objective. To evaluate the cost effectiveness of TNF-α antagonist therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the United Kingdom using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Registry (BSRBR). Methods. A simulation model is constructed to quantify the cost effectiveness of the TNF-α...
Saved in:
Published in: | Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Vol. 46; no. 8; pp. 1345 - 1354 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01-08-2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective. To evaluate the cost effectiveness of TNF-α antagonist therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the United Kingdom using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Registry (BSRBR). Methods. A simulation model is constructed to quantify the cost effectiveness of the TNF-α antagonist therapies (infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab) as a group versus traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, with a time horizon over the full patient lifetime. Participants are UK NHS patients in the BSRBR with RA who have failed at least two traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The BSRBR aims to recruit all RA patients starting on a TNF-α antagonist agent and follows them 6 monthly via consultant and patient administered questionnaires. Data collected include disease activity scores (DAS28), the Health Assessment Questionnaire and the SF-36. Costs include drug, monitoring and hospitalisations. Benefits are measured in disability and quality of life improvements. The main outcome measure is the incremental cost per quality adjusted life-year gained (discounted). Results. The basecase cost per quality adjusted life-year gained by using TNF-α antagonist therapies is estimated at £23 882, with probabilistic uncertainty analysis suggesting that the probability that treatments are below £30 000 per QALY is around 84%. The results are most sensitive to assumptions concerning long-term disability progression, discount rates and the validity or otherwise of SF6D derived utility measures. Subgroup analysis, monotherapy versus combination with methotrexate, and a limited analysis of sequential therapy with two TNF-α antagonist agents, suggest cost-effectiveness ratios around £20 000 to £30 000. Conclusions. The BSRBR data provide valuable evidence for estimating cost-effectiveness. The analysis concludes that current policies and practice for the use of TNF-α antagonist therapies, after RA patients have failed at least two traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, appear cost-effective in the context of the NICE re-appraisal of 2006 for England and Wales, thus supporting their decision to continue their reimbursement. Decision-makers worldwide might adapt this analysis because differential costs, discount rates and other factors could affect results. There remains uncertainty, particularly on long-term disease progression. Further data collection using the BSRBR is recommended, together with a revision to this analysis when data become available. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/HXZ-0TH31V5X-1 istex:32812B681D8141D97FD0BFA52C4E2051A65A0F41 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1462-0324 1462-0332 |
DOI: | 10.1093/rheumatology/kem115 |