Crystal growth of Ru-doped congruent LiNbO3 and investigation of crystalline perfection and optical properties

Single crystals of undoped and Ru‐doped congruent LiNbO3 (LN) were successfully grown by the Czochralski method. The axial and radial gradient of the radio frequency furnace was controlled in order to obtain crack‐free single crystals. Wafers were cut from the grown Ru‐doped single crystal at differ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied crystallography Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 1753 - 1760
Main Authors: Riscob, B., Bhaumik, Indranil, Ganesamoorthy, S., Bhatt, R., Vijayan, N., Zimik, Khavangkhui, Karnal, A. K., Bhagavannarayana, G., Gupta, P. K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 5 Abbey Square, Chester, Cheshire CH1 2HU, England International Union of Crystallography 01-12-2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Single crystals of undoped and Ru‐doped congruent LiNbO3 (LN) were successfully grown by the Czochralski method. The axial and radial gradient of the radio frequency furnace was controlled in order to obtain crack‐free single crystals. Wafers were cut from the grown Ru‐doped single crystal at different axial positions along the growth direction and subjected to various characterization analyses. Good optical homogeneity and low residual strain in the grown crystal is confirmed by the conoscopy patterns. Further, it is confirmed that Ru doping does not influence the optical sign of the crystal. From a high‐resolution X‐ray diffractometry analysis, it is evident that the as‐grown undoped LN crystal exhibited better crystalline perfection with a single and sharp diffraction curve in comparison to the Ru‐doped crystals, which are characterized by a broader diffraction curve. Absorption coefficient and band‐gap analysis across the axial length revealed a concentration variation of Ru across the length. Refractive index measurements carried out using a prism coupler showed variation in the optical birefringence, also due to the variation of Ru concentration at different positions of the grown single crystal.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JCR2RG5091
istex:FB94F3C696F2DDDA0C935685614800428C9327CA
ark:/67375/WNG-1BDHC0M7-K
ISSN:1600-5767
0021-8898
1600-5767
DOI:10.1107/S1600576715018464