Predictive maintenance based on anomaly detection using deep learning for air production unit in the railway industry

• Published in: 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) pp. 1 - 10
• Main Authors: Davari, Narjes, Veloso, Bruno, Ribeiro, Rita P., Pereira, Pedro Mota, Gama, Joao
• Format: Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: IEEE 06-10-2021
• Subjects: Air production unit; Deep learning; Failure detection; Feature extraction; Low-pass filters; Predictive maintenance; Production; Real-time systems; Sensor phenomena and characterization; Sensor systems; Sparse autoencoder; Time series
• DOI: 10.1109/DSAA53316.2021.9564181

Predictive maintenance methods assist early detection of failures and errors in machinery before they reach critical stages. This study proposes a data-driven predictive maintenance framework for the air production unit (APU) system of a train of Metro do Porto by deep learning based on a sparse autoencoder (SAE) network that efficiently detects abnormal data and considerably reduces the false alarm rate. Several analog and digital sensors installed on the APU system allow the detection of behavioral changes and deviations from the normal pattern by analyzing the collected data. We implemented two versions of the SAE network in which we inputted analog sensors data and digital sensors data, and the experimental results show that the failures due to air leakage problems are predicted by analog sensors data while other types of failures are identified by digital sensors data. A low pass filter is applied to the output of the SAE network, and a sequence of abnormal data is used as an alarm for the APU system failure. Performance indicators of the SAE network with digital sensors data, in terms of F1 Score, Recall, and Precision, are respectively, about 33.6%, 42%, and 28% better than those of the SAE network with analog sensors data. For comparison purposes, we also implemented a variational autoencoder (VAE). The results show that SAE performance is better than that of VAE by 14%, 77%, and 37% respectively, for Recall, Precision and F1 Score.