Real-time 3D cone beam reconstruction
The paper presents a comparison of filtered back-projection and iterative approaches (modified SIRT and OSEM) where backprojection is performed on FPGA hardware and forward projection is realized by a graphics card. The FPGA-architecture allows scaling parallel processing of the backprojection with...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004 Vol. 6; pp. 3648 - 3652 Vol. 6 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The paper presents a comparison of filtered back-projection and iterative approaches (modified SIRT and OSEM) where backprojection is performed on FPGA hardware and forward projection is realized by a graphics card. The FPGA-architecture allows scaling parallel processing of the backprojection with a constant memory bandwidth and it performs its task about a factor of 6 faster than conventional graphics card architectures (using a Xilinx Virtex II 6000 compared to a floating-point implementation on a graphics hardware). For the forward projection a graphics card (with NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900) is used. The system reconstructs a volume of 256/sup 3/ voxels and 60 projections (5122) within 6 seconds for each backprojection step and 12.5 s for the forward projection. As assumed filtered backprojection is the fastest method but shows most artifacts. SIRT and OSEM generate results with suppressed artifacts and require between 4 (SIRT) and 3 (OSEM) minutes for reconstruction. The limited precision of on the FPGA does not lead to any degradation in the reconstructed image quality. |
---|---|
ISBN: | 9780780387003 0780387007 |
ISSN: | 1082-3654 2577-0829 |
DOI: | 10.1109/NSSMIC.2004.1466673 |