A Comparison of IMGMT/I Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 3
• Main Authors: Lazarević, Milica, Jovanović, Nikola, Cvetković, Vladimir J, Tošić, Svetlana, Vitorović, Jelena, Stamenković, Slaviša, Nikolov, Vesna, Vidović, Nataša, Kostić Perić, Jelena, Jovanović, Marija, Mitrović, Tatjana
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 01-01-2023
• Subjects: Comparative analysis; Diagnosis; Genetic aspects; Genetic screening; Gliomas; Health aspects; Methods; Methyltransferases; Polymerase chain reaction; Serbia
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030360

Comparative analysis of the conventional methylation-specific PCR (MSP) vs. the quantitative MSP (qMSP) assessment of the O[sup.6] -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in 34 snap-frozen (SF) glioma samples was performed. The accuracy of the semi-quantitative MSP was compared with the corresponding qMSP semi-quantitative values using two semi-quantitative cut-off values (0—unmethylated and 1—weakly methylated) to discriminate methylated from unmethylated samples. In the case of the cut-off value 0, MSP test showed 80.0% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity compared to the reference qMSP analysis. However, when using the cut-off value 1, the diagnostic accuracy of the MSP test was significantly higher (85.7% sensitivity, 85.2% specificity). Fleiss’ Kappa statistical analyses indicated moderate agreement (Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient = 0.509; 70.59% agreement) between MSP and qMSP semi-quantitative measurements of MGMT promoter methylation in glioma patients, justifying the conventional MSP use in diagnostics and confirming its high reliability. Further, we aimed to compare the validity of SF and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) glioma samples for MGMT testing. Statistical analyses indicated moderate overall agreement of FFPE glioma samples and SF MSP semi-quantitative measurements (Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient = 0.516/0.509; 70.0% agreement) and emphasized their low reliability in the assessment of highly methylated MGMT promoter samples.