Unequal access to cadaveric kidney transplantation in California based on insurance status

To assess the impact of insurance status on access to kidney transplantation among California dialysis patients. California Medicare and Medicaid dialysis populations. All California ESRD dialysis patients under age 65 eligible for Medicare or Medicaid in 1991 (n = 9,102) took part in this cohort an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health services research Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 879 - 900
Main Authors: Thamer, M, Henderson, S C, Ray, N F, Rinehart, C S, Greer, J W, Danovitch, G M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Health Research and Educational Trust 01-10-1999
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To assess the impact of insurance status on access to kidney transplantation among California dialysis patients. California Medicare and Medicaid dialysis populations. All California ESRD dialysis patients under age 65 eligible for Medicare or Medicaid in 1991 (n = 9,102) took part in this cohort analytic study. Medicare and California Medicaid Program data were matched to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Kidney Wait List files. Only 31.4 percent of California Medicaid dialysis patients were placed on the kidney transplant waiting list compared to 38.8 percent and 45.0 percent of dually eligible Medicate/Medicaid and Medicare patients, respectively. Compared to the Medicaid population, Medicare enrollees were more likely to be placed on the kidney transplant waiting list (adjusted Relative Risk [RR] = 2.10, Confidence Interval [CI] 1.68, 2.62) as were dually eligible patients (RR = 1.54, CI 1.24, 1.91). Once on the waiting list, however, Medicare enrollment did not influence the adjusted median waiting time to acquire a first cadaveric transplant (p > .05). California dialysis patients excluded from Medicare coverage, who are disproportionately minority, female, and poor, are much less likely to enter the U.S. transplant system. We hypothesize that patient concerns with potential subsequent loss of insurance coverage as well as cultural and educational barriers are possible explanatory factors. Once in the system, however, insurance status does not influence receipt of a cadaveric renal transplant.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-9124
1475-6773