Formalist Art Criticism and the Politics of Meaning

From the 1940s until the late 1960s, formalist criticism functioned to appropriate modernist art to the market interests and conventional sensibilities of the art world. By its judgments of taste, it certified the worthiness of art objects for markets, facilitating processes of the reception of artw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social justice (San Francisco, Calif.) Vol. 33; no. 2 (104); pp. 31 - 44
Main Author: Tekiner, Deniz
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: San Francisco Social Justice 01-01-2006
Crime and Social Justice Associates
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:From the 1940s until the late 1960s, formalist criticism functioned to appropriate modernist art to the market interests and conventional sensibilities of the art world. By its judgments of taste, it certified the worthiness of art objects for markets, facilitating processes of the reception of artworks as commodities. Tekiner explains how the formalist art criticism associated with Clement Greenberg function symbiotically with art marketers to uphold conservative agendas and to mask the progressive content intended by many modern artists who construe their transcendental subjects as signifiers of freedom, and their art works as expressions of liberated imagination during the stultifying conformism of postwar North America.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1043-1578
2327-641X