Hospital contingency in coping with COVID-19 in Brazil: governmental problems and alternatives

This paper analyzes the government's strategic agenda for coping with COVID-19 in Brazil, focusing on hospital care. Twenty-eight Contingency Plans were analyzed in full, one national, 26 at state level, and one from the Federal District. The Public Policy Cycle's theoretical framework was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ciência & saude coletiva Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 1407 - 1418
Main Authors: Santos, Thadeu Borges Souza, Andrade, Laise Rezende de, Vieira, Silvana Lima, Duarte, Joseane Aparecida, Martins, Juliete Sales, Rosado, Lilian Barbosa, Oliveira, Juliana Dos Santos, Pinto, Isabela Cardoso de Matos
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Portuguese
Spanish
Published: Brazil Associacao Brasileira de Pos-Graduacao em Saude Coletiva - ABRASCO 01-04-2021
Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper analyzes the government's strategic agenda for coping with COVID-19 in Brazil, focusing on hospital care. Twenty-eight Contingency Plans were analyzed in full, one national, 26 at state level, and one from the Federal District. The Public Policy Cycle's theoretical framework was used, specifically governmental pre-decision and decision to face the pandemic. The evidence revealed convergences between the national and state levels concerning proposals for reorienting care flow, detecting cases, and indicating referral hospitals. However, the state agendas revealed weaknesses in acquiring mechanical ventilation devices, sizing human resources, and regionalizing hospital care. Moreover, few states have established a method for calculating back-end beds, mainly regarding the outlook of opening hospitals of reference or contracting additional ICU beds. We can conclude that the heterogeneous actions explained in the plans show the complex process of coping with COVID-19 in Brazil with its regional inequalities, weaknesses in the state health systems, and reduced coordination by the Ministry of Health.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1413-8123
1678-4561
DOI:10.1590/1413-81232021264.43472020