Monotonie and cyclic behaviour of root-reinforced sand

• Published in: Canadian geotechnical journal Vol. 58; no. 12; pp. 1915 - 1927
• Main Authors: Karimzadeh, Ali Akbar, Leung, Anthony Kwan, Hosseinpour, Saied, Wu, Zhaoyi, Amini, Pedram Fardad
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: NRC Research Press 01-12-2021
• Subjects: Environmental aspects; Mechanical properties; Roots (Botany); Sand; Soil liquefaction; China
• ISSN: 0008-3674; 1208-6010
• DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2020-0626

Plant roots are known to provide mechanical reinforcement to soils upon shearing and seismic loading. However, the effects of different stress paths on root reinforcement remain unclear. Moreover, whether and how roots provide resistance to soil liquefaction upon cyclic loading have rarely been studied. The objective of this study is to conduct a series of undrained triaxial tests to investigate the monotonic and cyclic behaviour of rooted sand. Roots of vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.), which has been advocated for use in shallow slope stabilisation purposes, were used for testing. The root diameters ranged between 0.3 and 1.5 mm, while the root volume ratios (RVRs) were 0.23%, 0.45%, and 0.67%. It was discovered that the root reinforcement effect was anisotropic and path-dependent. Along the extension path, when the major principal stress was perpendicular to the predominant root orientation, the root-induced increase in soil friction angle was approximately 10[degrees]. This increase was much greater than that along the compression path, where the change was minimal. The presence of roots prevented the limited flow failure at some RVRs and cyclic stress ratios (CSRs) (which occurred in the unreinforced sand) and the failure mode of the root-reinforced soil switched to cyclic mobility. The liquefaction resistance was improved with an increase in root volume, and this improvement was more remarkable at higher CSRs.