Association Between Osteoprotegerin G1181C and T245G Polymorphisms and Diabetic Charcot Neuroarthropathy: A case-control study

OBJECTIVE: Charcot neuroarthropathy is a disabling complication of diabetes. Although its pathogenesis remains unknown, we suppose that genetics may play a relevant role. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a case-control study with 59 subjects with diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy (Ch group)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes care Vol. 32; no. 9; pp. 1694 - 1697
Main Authors: Pitocco, Dario, Zelano, Giovanni, Gioffrè, Giuseppina, Di Stasio, Enrico, Zaccardi, Francesco, Martini, Francesca, Musella, Tittania, Scavone, Giuseppe, Galli, Marco, Caputo, Salvatore, Mancini, Lorena, Ghirlanda, Giovanni
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Alexandria, VA American Diabetes Association 01-09-2009
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVE: Charcot neuroarthropathy is a disabling complication of diabetes. Although its pathogenesis remains unknown, we suppose that genetics may play a relevant role. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a case-control study with 59 subjects with diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy (Ch group), 41 with diabetic neuropathy without Charcot neuroarthropathy (ND group), and 103 healthy control subjects (H group) to evaluate the impact of two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the osteoprotegerin gene (G1181C and T245G) on the risk of Charcot neuroarthropathy. RESULTS: Regarding the SNPs of G1181C, we found a significant linkage between the G allele and Charcot neuroarthropathy (Ch vs. ND, odds ratio [OR] 2.32 [95% CI 1.3-4.1], P = 0.006; Ch vs. H, 2.10 [1.3-3.3], P = 0.002; and ND vs. H, 0.90 [0.7-1.9], P = 0.452); similarly, we found a linkage with the G allele of T245G (Ch vs. ND, 6.25 [2.2-19.7], P < 0.001; Ch vs. H, 3.56 [1.9-6.7], P = 0.001; and ND vs. H, 0.54 [0.6-5.7], P = 0.304), supporting a protective role for the allele C and T, respectively. For this reason we investigated the frequency of the protective double homozygosis CC + TT (7% in Ch) that was significantly lower in Ch compared with H (0.18 [0.06-0.5], P = 0.002) and with ND (0.17 [0.05-0.58], P = 0.006), whereas there was no difference between H and ND (1.05 [0.43-2.0], P = 0.468). In a multivariate logistic backward regression model, only weight and the lack of CC and TT genotypes were independently associated with the presence of Charcot neuroarthropathy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that shows an association between genetic regulation of bone remodeling and Charcot neuroarthropathy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
D.P. and G.Z. contributed equally to this study.
ISSN:0149-5992
1935-5548
DOI:10.2337/dc09-0243