Permanent Erb palsy: A traction-related injury?

Historically, the primary risk factor attributed to brachial plexus injury during birth has been excessive traction applied at delivery to an entrapped anterior shoulder. However, recent evidence has suggested that not all cases of brachial plexus palsy are attributable to traction. We have encounte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) Vol. 89; no. 1; pp. 139 - 141
Main Authors: Ouzounian, Joseph G., Korst, Lisa M., Phelan, Jeffrey P.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 1997
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Elsevier Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Historically, the primary risk factor attributed to brachial plexus injury during birth has been excessive traction applied at delivery to an entrapped anterior shoulder. However, recent evidence has suggested that not all cases of brachial plexus palsy are attributable to traction. We have encountered several cases of permanent Erb palsy associated with birth that were not attributable to traction applied at delivery. We reviewed cases of neonates with documented permanent Erb palsy that occurred either in the absence of shoulder dystocia or in the neonate's posterior arm in the presence of anterior shoulder dystocia. We identified four cases that occurred in the absence of shoulder dystocia and four cases that occurred in the posterior arm of infants with anterior shoulder dystocia. These data further support the notion that the etiology of permanent brachial plexus palsy associated with birth may not be related to traction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0029-7844
1873-233X
DOI:10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00312-2