The effects of confinement on periparturient behaviour and circulating prolactin, prostaglandin F 2α and oxytocin in gilts with access to a variety of nest materials

• Published in: Applied animal behaviour science Vol. 76; no. 2; pp. 135 - 156
• Main Authors: Damm, B.I, Bildsøe, M, Gilbert, C, Ladewig, J, Vestergaard, K.S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 04-03-2002
• Subjects: Hormones; Housing; Nest-building behaviour; Parturition; Sows; Parturition; Nest-building behaviour; Hormones; Housing; Sows
• ISSN: 0168-1591; 1872-9045
• DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00212-X

In a 2×2 factorial experiment, the effects of gestation and farrowing housing on (1) periparturient behaviour and circulating prolactin, prostaglandin F
2α (PGF
2α) and oxytocin in gilts with access to peat, straw and branches, and (2) correlational relationships between the periparturient behaviour and hormones were studied. The treatments consisted of housing in stalls or pens from mating to day 110 of gestation followed by farrowing crates or pens until after parturition. Landrace×Yorkshire gilts were observed from video recordings (
n=25) from 20
h prepartum and blood sampled via jugular catheters (
n=16) from 24
h prepartum until 2
h after the birth of the first piglet.
There was an interaction between gestation and farrowing housing affecting the start of nest-building (
P=0.03). Gilts that experienced a change in type of housing accommodation commenced nest-building closer to parturition than gilts that were penned both during gestation and at farrowing (both
P<0.05). There were no effects of the housing environment on the timing of termination of nest-building, behaviour during parturition, or the course of parturition. However, relative to base level, crated gilts sat more from 16 to 6
h prepartum, whereas this was the case for penned gilts only from 9 to 7
h prepartum. Crated gilts also tended to change posture more often (
P=0.07) and lie more in sternal recumbency (
P=0.095). This suggests that familiarity with the environment in combination with space to move about and/or availability of materials is important in the timing of nest-building. Confinement during farrowing did not appear to impair feed-back from the materials and the nest, although increased number of postural changes may reflect the motivation but inability to nest-build, or general discomfort in the crate.
There was a development over time in postural and nest-building behaviours as well as in plasma concentrations of prolactin, PGF
2α (measured by the metabolite PGFM) and oxytocin, but there were only few effects of housing treatments on hormones or associations between behaviour and hormones. The results suggest that nest-building occurs independently of a prepartum rise in prolactin, but that oxytocin may be associated with the termination of nest-building as there was a negative correlational relationship with nosing (
P<0.01) and arranging nest-building materials (
P<0.001).
Farrowing crate housing appeared to have fewer effects on periparturient behaviour and course of parturition than reported in previous studies where effects of confinement and provision of nest-building materials may have been confounded. Thus, provision of nest-building materials to crated sows may have beneficial effects on sow behaviour and welfare.